Consonant Enhancement Effects on Speech Recognition of Hearing-Impaired Children

Abstract

Differences in gain (enhancement, in dB) required to optimize the consonant/vowel intensity ratio in nonsense syllables were determined for stops and fricatives, both voiced and voiceless, in 12 children with congenital moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. The test stimuli were vowel/consonant nonsense syllables with various levels of enhancement ranging from 0 dB (for the unprocessed stimulus) to 24 dB of gain, in steps of 3 or 6 dB. Results showed that significant improvements in consonant recognition can be obtained with individualized adjustment of consonant amplitude for children as young as 5 years of age.

Abbreviations: CE = consonant enhacement, CVR = consonant/vowel intensity ratio, NST = Nonsense Syllable Test

Key Words

Children - hearing impaired - speech perception

• REFERENCES

• Abromovitz A. (1971). Assessment of auditory perception. J South Afr Speech Hear Assoc 18: 11–22.
• Allen P, Wightman F, Kistler D, Dolan T. (1989). Frequency resolution in children. J Speech Hear Res 32: 317–322.
• Bennet CA, Franklin NL. (1954). Statistical Analysis in Chemistry and the Chemical Industry. Section 6.32. New York: Wiley.
• Dubno JR, Levitt H. (1981). Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 69: 249–261.
• French NR, Steinberg JC. (1947). Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 19: 90–119.
• Ireyman R, Nerbonne G, Cote H. (1991). Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition. J Speech Hear Res 34: 415–426.
• Gordon-Salant S. (1987). Effects of acoustic modification on consonant perception by elderly hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 81: 1199–1202.
• Guttman N, Nelson JR. (1968). An instrument that creates some artificial speech spectra for the severely hard of hearing. Am Ann Deaf 113: 295–302.
• Irwin RJ, Stillman JA, Shade A. (1986). The width of the auditory filter in children. J Exp Psychol 41: 429–442.
• Kennedy E, Levitt H, Neuman AC, Weiss M. (1998). Consonant-vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 103: 1098–1114.
• Kryter KD. (1985). The Effects of Noise on Man. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
• Levitt H, Rabiner LR. (1971). Analysis of fundamental frequency contours. J Acoust Soc Am 49: 569–582.
• Levitt H, Resnick S. (1978). Speech reception by the hearing-impaired: methods of testing and the development of new tests. Scand Audiol Suppl 6: 107–129.
• Montgomery A, Edge R. (1988). Evaluation of two speech enhancement techniques to improve intelligibility for hearing-impaired adults. J Acoust Soc Am 31: 386–393.
• Neuman A, Hochberg I. (1983). Children's perception of speech in reverberation. J Acoust Soc Am 73: 2145–2149.
• Picheny MA, Durlach NI, Braida LD. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hear Res 29: 434–446.
• Preves D. (1994). Current and future applications of digital hearing aid technology. In Sandlin RE, ed. Understanding Digitally Programmable Hearing Aids. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Revoile SG, Holden-Pitt L, Edward D, Pickett J. (1986). Some rehabilitative considerations for future speech-processing hearing aids. J Rehabil Res Dev 23: 89–94.
• Siegenthaler B. (1969). Maturation of auditory abilities in children. Int Audiol 8: 59–71.
• Werner LA, Rubel EW. (1992). Developmental Psychoacoustics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.